If you've used NarraFirma, or you've just heard about it, you might be curious about where its ideas come from. This page is your answer.
I (Cynthia Kurtz) have been working in the field of organizational and community narrative since 1999. NarraFirma is the tenth software tool I have built and/or designed to support participatory story work. After I created each tool, I worked with it and learned what worked and what didn't. So NarraFirma rests on over two decades of research and practice.
On this page I'll briefly explain each tool, how and why it was developed, and what I learned from building it.
First try (2000): Annotation
At IBM Research, in 2000, I used the database tools in Lotus Notes to create an unnamed system that asked questions about stories and compiled the answers into patterns I used to write reports for (internal) clients. This was essentially the genesis of participatory narrative inquiry.
I answered the questions myself, and I used the answers, along with annotations drawn from story texts, to create "observations" that I clustered into a "data model" that represented what the stories were saying. When I wrote this tool I was heavily into grounded theory, so it most closely resembles a qualitative research tool. But if you look closely at the screenshot you can see a hint of mixed methods, because I estimated the "prevalence" of each observation (e.g., where it says "Users" I have "many" or "some" and, as I recall, "few").
I used this tool on several research projects. At the end of my work at IBM Research, I wrote a 125-page document that described how to do the process we created. It was a lot like the book I ended up writing (and then improving) eight years later, except that IBM didn't give me permission to publish it (and that I learned a lot in the following eight years).
Second try (2001): Juxtaposition
My second piece of software, which I called the "oral history database prototype," was also created for IBM. This time it was for the IBM Institute for Knowledge Management, for which I was a contractor for a few years. I created it soon after starting to work with Dave Snowden and Sharon Darwent of IBM Global Services on client projects.
The big advance in this project was in the juxtaposition of Dave's and Sharon's archetypes (which I now call story elements) with the questions I used in my earlier attempt.
This screenshot shows a translated version (topic and story titles changed, but patterns as we found them) of my first non-IBM story project, with something like 40 stories. I transcribed the stories and answered the questions myself. I'm not sure where the "archetypes, stakeholders, and themes" came from; I think the client might have created those in sensemaking sessions. I can still remember my surprise when I first saw the fascinating and useful patterns in these simple graphs. I saw fascinating and useful patterns in my earlier non-graphical software, of course, but seeing them in images made them "jump out" much more. I knew this was a good idea.
We used this software for something like twenty (I'm guessing here) projects over the next few years, and it slowly got more complicated.
Third try (2003): Visualization
My third story-related software tool was created for the U.S. government, at the tail end of a three-year project helping analysts make sense of safety-related situations by listening to stories.
For this research project, my mandate was to think about all the ways in which people could gain insights by looking at lots of stories together. I started by reading through the literature on data visualization and choosing published approaches that looked promising. Then I created prototypes to try out each idea with a data set (of answers to questions about stories). I called what I had created the "Mass Narrative Representation" (MNR) prototypes.
This software explored several ways to show data about stories, from text-based descriptions to indicators on a line to points on a graph. The prototypes I created turned into SenseMaker Explorer, and were used for dozens of projects. I kept working on (and using) SenseMaker Explorer until sometime in 2009.
Fourth try (2005): Collaboration
My fourth attempt was a prototype collaborative software tool, built as a "concept demonstrator" for the Singapore government, as part of a three-year project to help people make sense of safety-related situations by listening to stories (the project was called RAHS). The prevailing feature of this software was its real-time collaboration for groups working together. My husband and I worked on it together.
In this project we learned a lot about what it would take to support groups of people working through story projects together on computers. The software was never used after it was demonstrated (for complicated internal reasons I never fully understood).
Fifth try (2006): Simulation
Another research project I did in the RAHS years was to look into simulation of network activity, to consider new ways to help analysts make sense of networks (particularly of terrorists).
I called the resulting prototype SN_Sim. Its purpose was to help groups of people think through situations by playing with conditions of connectivity to see how the simulated network responded.
I built the simulation based on the concepts of homophily and Blau space, which are ways of connecting people other than with simple "I know you, you know me" relationships. (I wrote a white paper about this project.)
In this project, I learned even more about writing software that helps people make sense of complex-and-complicated patterns by creating things they can look at and play with.
Sixth try (2007): Collection
Also as part of my/our work on RAHS, my husband and I built and maintained the first three versions of SenseMaker Collector, a system people used to gather stories over the internet.
I based much of the design on what I'd seen used in existing survey software such as SurveyMonkey (I believe I looked at other systems as well, but I can't recall what they were now). I added features that made sense for asking people to tell stories, and for asking people questions about their stories.
This was the first time I designed software to be used for collecting (rather than working with) stories.
Seventh try (2007): Construction
This is the last RAHS story, I promise. I was asked to create prototype software to help people create sensemaking constructs -- models -- together. The result was SenseMaker Modeler. You could use it to do most of the sensemaking exercises we had created (timelines, landscapes, story elements, story construction) using software.
I don't remember Modeler having real-time multi-user elements. As I recall, people were meant to work on models with one person interacting with the software while others simply watched their screen. I would have liked to have made it multi-user if I had had more time to work on the project, but it was only one research project of many within the umbrella of that work.
Modeler was used on a few projects, but not many. I can't remember why.
Eighth try (2008): Story sharing
By 2008 my husband and I had saved up a little money, so I decided to take a few months off and do something I had wanted to do since 1999. I wanted to help people share stories in groups.
The result was Rakontu. I meant Rakontu to be working software, but it turned out more as a research project. This was partly because I didn't have a lot of time to work on it, and partly because I built it on top of the Google App Engine, which was not as reliable or stable a platform as I thought it would be.
I still think the ideas in Rakontu are valid, and people still keep telling me they are interested in the ideas, but the world is so saturated with social media ideas (and people looking for money for social media ideas) that I haven't been able to get funding to continue work on Rakontu. Maybe someday I'll get back to it.
Rakontu was in active use for about four months. We had about forty people signed up, but most of the actual day-to-day use of the software was between myself and John Caddell. I'm glad I worked on Rakontu. I learned a lot about building collaborative on-line story software.
Ninth try (2009): Catalysis
After I stopped working on SenseMaker, I wanted to create a new version of software to use for my catalysis work for clients. The result was NarraCat.
In making NarraCat I made a pretty major departure from all of my previous attempts (except maybe the first one). It was this. When I used Sensemaker Explorer to create catalysis reports for clients, I found that I needed to work systematically through the patterns that appeared. I couldn't just hop around in the data, choosing patterns I liked, because I was considering the data for other people. I needed to work my way carefully through every possible connection. So I kept adding more and more reports to Explorer; using the reports almost exclusively; and ignoring the dynamic response system I had built earlier (which is useful in group sensemaking but not in catalysis).
Thus, when I decided to write new software to use in client projects, I wanted it to be all about the reporting. So I created a simple interface that spits out hundreds or thousands of graphs to file directories. I used NarraCat on all of my client projects from 2009 to mid-2017. NarraCat became an old and trusted friend: capable, reliable, and easy to tinker with.
So why did I abandon NarraCat? Because I was the only one who found it easy to use. In the several years it was available, only a few people told me they had used it successfully. In fact, more people told me they tried to use NarraCat and failed. It was just too complicated and messy for non-programmers.
I felt sad about that fact for years. I made a few attempts to "package" NarraCat so a non-programmer could use it more easily, but I kept running into snags related to Python and the matplotlib library. Eventually I realized that I would have to rewrite NarraCat from scratch using some other system. That feeling of wanting to help a wider range of people led to the development of NarraFirma.
But wait! There’s more!
Two projects didn't make it into this top ten list, the first because I didn't design it, the second because it's not really software. But these two projects also contributed to my thoughts in eventually creating NarraFirma.
Not exactly my software (1998): StoryHarp
Before I ever heard of organizational and community narrative, my husband and I wrote a series of educational software titles. One of them was an interactive fiction editor for text or audio choose-your-own-adventure stories. It was called StoryHarp.
StoryHarp was entirely Paul's idea, but I helped with some of the GUI design, help system, and examples. (You can read one of my example interactive stories, "House and Yard," on the StoryHarp web site.)
It just goes to show that I was thinking about stories before I ever thought about stories.
Not exactly software (2000): StoryML
This one I didn't include in my top-ten history because it wasn't software. But while I was at IBM Research, in 2000, my research group conceived the idea of creating an XML schema for the description of stories. I was all for it, so I took over the idea.
I spent about three months reading through a huge literature related to stories in several fields. Every time I came to a question you could ask about a story, I wrote it down. Then when I felt things were starting to repeat, I started clustering. From this I created a schema with about 400 questions you could possibly ask about a story. It was hierarchical, with several levels, and the idea was to create "collapsible metadata" so a story could be described in more or less detail. The intent was to support a tagged database of stories.
The XML schema was never used in exactly that way, but -- most importantly to me -- this work was the genesis of my understanding that asking questions about stories could tell you a lot about them, about their topic, and about yourself. You could say that PNI grew in part out of StoryML.
I don't have a screenshot of it, but I created an "outliner" Python script to show the StoryML schema in all its nested glory, and used that in a presentation on StoryML. You can look at a (different) presentation I gave about the StoryML project (without the outline) here. (If you're wondering about the 400 questions, I asked IBM if I could publish them, and they said no. I incorporated some of my favorite questions into various projects afterward, so they survived in a way, but not as they were originally listed.)
Even though StoryML wasn't strictly speaking software, it had a huge influence on all of my work, including software development, afterward.